Over the past years, digital sovereignty has moved from policy discussion to operational reality for security teams across Europe.
For security leaders, service providers, and public sector organizations, this is no longer theoretical. It shows up in audits, procurement processes, customer contracts, and board-level risk discussions. At Logpoint, we see this every day.
Digital sovereignty does not mean isolation or rejection of global technology. It means clarity of control, predictability of jurisdiction, and the ability to choose how and where critical security systems operate.
Many modern security platforms are built on assumptions that do not hold in regulated European environments, including centralized infrastructure dependency, opaque data paths, and limited deployment choice. These models work well for some organizations. They do not work for all.
Across Europe, security operators face growing regulatory and operational pressure. Compliance obligations, data residency requirements, and sector-specific rules are now part of daily operations. Questions about where data flows, who controls the platform, and which legal frameworks apply are fundamental risk considerations.
This is why Logpoint was built differently.
We believe security platforms should give customers real choice. Choice in deployment models. Choice in infrastructure. Choice in how data is processed and retained. Choice in how regulatory obligations are met.
No company operates outside geopolitical or legal realities. What matters is transparency, control, and optionality.
Logpoint is a European company, headquartered and governed under European Union law. We are not a United States based provider, and we are not subject to foreign jurisdictions by default through ownership or headquarters. This matters for organizations assessing legal exposure, data residency, and regulatory risk.
We are clear and transparent with our customers and partners. Legal obligations depend on how systems are deployed and operated. Our role is to ensure customers can make these choices consciously, with full visibility into the trade offs.
Digital sovereignty is not about drawing lines between regions or technologies. It is about giving security teams the confidence to choose the architecture and operating model that fits their obligations and risk profile.
That choice should belong to the organizations.
